2020
DOI: 10.1080/14685248.2020.1757685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A perspective on machine learning in turbulent flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various deep-learning applications have recently been developed for broad areas of turbulence research (Kutz 2017; Brenner, Eldredge & Freund 2019; Duraisamy, Iaccarino & Xiao 2019; Brunton, Noack & Koumoutsakos 2020; Fukami, Fukagata & Taira 2020 a ; Pandey, Schumacher & Sreenivasan 2020). Ling, Kurzawski & Templeton (2016) proposed a tensor-based NN by embedding the Galilean invariance of a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model, showing a greater performance improvement than linear and nonlinear eddy viscosity models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various deep-learning applications have recently been developed for broad areas of turbulence research (Kutz 2017; Brenner, Eldredge & Freund 2019; Duraisamy, Iaccarino & Xiao 2019; Brunton, Noack & Koumoutsakos 2020; Fukami, Fukagata & Taira 2020 a ; Pandey, Schumacher & Sreenivasan 2020). Ling, Kurzawski & Templeton (2016) proposed a tensor-based NN by embedding the Galilean invariance of a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model, showing a greater performance improvement than linear and nonlinear eddy viscosity models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive results from the machine learning models reinforce the importance of data-driven methods for modelling turbulence, a practice that is gaining popularity [46][47][48][49] . An accurate estimation of the large-scale velocity and heat transport helps scientists and engineers to better understand thermally driven flows encountered in nature and in engineering applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In this paper, we employ machine-learning (ML) tools to construct models for predicting Re and Nu. This approach, which is increasingly gaining popularity in fluid mechanics [46][47][48][49][50] , involves building and improving prediction algorithms by "learning" from the existing data [51][52][53] . Hence, in the present work, we do not delve much into the physics behind Re and Nu relations; instead, we use the data from previous works to develop the prediction models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we intend to give an overview of recent research efforts into turbulence modeling with ML methods or, more precisely, data‐driven closure models and methods. It is not meant to replace the already existing valuable review articles on this matter, for example, [17,55,58], but to provide a complementary perspective with a particular focus on large Eddy simulation (LES) methods, although many of the challenges and chances of ML in this field also directly transfer to the Reynolds averaged Navier‐Stokes (RANS) system. We have attempted to present both the simulative side and the ML side in a concise and self‐contained manner with a focus on the basic principles, so that the text may be useful to nonspecialists as well, and provide a first starting point from which to venture further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%