1982
DOI: 10.1016/0083-6656(82)90008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A perspectivist review of supermetallicity studies — 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the observational side, uncertainties exist in -22estimates of reddening (cf. Taylor 1982;Burstein, Faber & Gonzalez 1986), metallicity (Burstein et al 1986), distance (MMJ), and scatter observed along the MS (cf. §5, above).…”
Section: Isochone Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the observational side, uncertainties exist in -22estimates of reddening (cf. Taylor 1982;Burstein, Faber & Gonzalez 1986), metallicity (Burstein et al 1986), distance (MMJ), and scatter observed along the MS (cf. §5, above).…”
Section: Isochone Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The many divergent determinations of reddening and distance moduli in the literature were also discussed in these papers, including the earliest V, BϪV data measured by Johnson & Sandage (1955) for their initial diagram. A summary of work up to 1981 is given by Taylor (1985).…”
Section: M67mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spinrad‐Taylor paper prompted ongoing research on possible ‘SMR’ stars and related topics. 13 years later, two fairly sizeable review papers were required to summarize that research (see Taylor 1982a,b). However, there was no agreement about which stars (if any) are SMR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%