1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pH-dependent stabilization of an active site loop observed from low and high ph crystal structures of mutant monomeric glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase at 1.8 to 1.9 Å

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
56
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The position of the Mg 2+ in the current M. tuberculosis structure approximates the expected position of the GAR α-amino group, as deduced from substrate and substrate analogue binding studies on EcPurN and HsPurN. 9,[13][14][15]20 The interactions made by this Mg 2+ , if it is regarded as a surrogate for the GAR α-amino group, would be consistent with the involvement of Asn116, His118, and Asp154 in activation of this amino group to facilitate nucleophilic attack. At least two of the three amino acids Asn106, His108 and Asp144 in EcPurN are absolutely required for in vivo activity, and it has been suggested that any two of these three polar residues could activate the amino group of GAR.…”
Section: Ion Binding and Loop Variability In The Substrate-binding Sitementioning
confidence: 59%
“…The position of the Mg 2+ in the current M. tuberculosis structure approximates the expected position of the GAR α-amino group, as deduced from substrate and substrate analogue binding studies on EcPurN and HsPurN. 9,[13][14][15]20 The interactions made by this Mg 2+ , if it is regarded as a surrogate for the GAR α-amino group, would be consistent with the involvement of Asn116, His118, and Asp154 in activation of this amino group to facilitate nucleophilic attack. At least two of the three amino acids Asn106, His108 and Asp144 in EcPurN are absolutely required for in vivo activity, and it has been suggested that any two of these three polar residues could activate the amino group of GAR.…”
Section: Ion Binding and Loop Variability In The Substrate-binding Sitementioning
confidence: 59%
“…This implies that N-terminal IMPCH domain somewhat stabilizes on interaction with Cterminal domain as it attains a more stable structural fold in full-length SlugATIC as compared with a molten globule structure in free-form. This could be due to the unavailability of ATIC crystal structure with naturally occurring 10-f-THF (due to its unstability) with a reduced pterin flexible ring which could have more favorable interactions in the folate binding site/pocket in comparison to the available crystal structures of ATIC with the folate analogs which have rigid aromatic deazafolate ring [6,23]. Interestingly, a reduction in T m (38.9, 43.4, and 46.1°C) of melting transitions were observed on DSC analysis of an equimolar mixture of two domains with none of peaks as prominent as was case in full-length SlugATIC (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the lower T m of the major transition peak in case of SlugATIC as compared to individual domains could be attributed to stabilization of N-terminal domain and could have functional implications (Table 3). Interestingly, GAR TFase another enzyme utilizing 10f-THF in the de novo pathway had been reported to show large conformational change in the folate binding loop (open and closed conformation) which sequesters the folate from bulk solvent [23,24]. 7D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enzyme glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (GART) participates in the de novo biosynthetic pathway of purines (Garrett and Grishnan 1995). GART undergoes two major conformational changes as a function of pH, a coil–helix transition (Almassy et al 1992; Su et al 1998) and a dimer–monomer transition (Almassy et al 1992; Mullen and Jennings 1996; Su et al 1998), both with pK a ∼ 7. Specifically, an 8‐residue segment (residues 120–127) of a 21‐residue‐long loop (residues 111–131), called hereafter the activation loop, becomes an α‐helix at high pH, called hereafter the activation helix (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high pH the activation loop–helix caps and shields the active site from solvent, to facilitate catalysis (Almassy et al 1992; Greasley et al 1999). In addition to the coil–helix transition, GART converts from a dimeric form at low pH to a monomeric form at high pH (Almassy et al 1992; Mullen and Jennings 1996; Su et al 1998). The two pH‐dependent conformational changes appear to be independent because they occur at different surfaces of the enzyme; however, cooperativity cannot be excluded at present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%