© F e r r a t a S t o r t i F o u n d a t i o nfor core-binding factor (CBF) AML (t(8;21); inv(16); (t(16;16)) was performed at each institution prior to enrollment, and patients were excluded if CBF positive. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki after approval by the ethics committee of each participating center.
TreatmentPatients were randomized by centralized computer-generated allocation procedure (REDCap 13 ) 2:1 to receive FLAM (arm A): flavopiridol 50 mg/m 2 IV days 1-3, cytarabine 2 gm/m 2 CI IV days 6-8 (667 mg/m 2 /day), and mitoxantrone 40 mg/m 2 IV day 9 or 7+3 (arm B): cytarabine 100 mg/m 2 /day CI IV days 1-7, and daunorubicin 90 mg/m 2 IV days 1-3 (idarubicin 12 mg/m 2 IV days 1-3 was substituted as needed for lack of daunorubicin availability). Patients were stratified according to the following risk factors: 1) age 50 years or over; 2) secondary AML (defined as treatmentrelated AML or AML from antecedent hematologic disorder) and/or known adverse cytogenetics; 14 and 3) hyperleukocytosis [white blood cell (WBC) count >50x10 9 /L]. All patients received a BM biopsy on day 14 unless medically contraindicated. Residual leukemia on day 14 was defined as BM blasts 5% or more morphologically with overall cellularity 10% or more. Arm B patients were eligible to receive an additional cycle of induction therapy, 5+2 (cytarabine 100 mg/m 2 /day CI IV days 1-5, daunorubicin 45 mg/m 2 IV days 1-2) in the setting of residual leukemia on day 14. Post-induction treatment was performed according to physician preference.
Response and toxicityBone marrow (BM) aspirates and biopsies were performed before treatment, on day 14 of treatment, and at hematologic recovery or when leukemia regrowth was suspected. Response criteria were defined according to standard definitions.14 Adverse events were graded by NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 4.0.
Statistical analysisThe study was designed to compare CR rates between FLAM and one cycle of 7+3, using a Bayesian approach for interim monitoring for futility. The primary analysis would conclude a significant benefit for FLAM if the one-sided P value from a Fisher's exact test less than 0.10. A sample size of 165 patients, randomized 2:1 to FLAM or 7+3, respectively, yielded 85% power to detect an increase in the probability of CR from 55% with 7+315-17 to 75% with FLAM. In addition to the planned primary end point analysis, CR rates between FLAM and 7+3+/-5+2 were analyzed by Fisher's exact test with a one-sided P value analogous to the primary end point analysis.Secondary end points included toxicity comparisons, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS). OS was defined from date of randomization to death or last known follow up. EFS was defined as date of randomization to the first occurrence of persistent AML after one cycle of induction, relapse or death. Patients were censored for EFS if they had received non-protocol therapy or an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). All significan...