2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.04.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase-field model for bainitic transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the several analytical and numerical modelings of bainite transformation, e.g. [45,46,47,48,49], an extensive analysis of the elastically governed autocatalytic evolution of a single variant is largely impending. Given the in uence of the autocatalysis in the formulation of the transformation kinetics, as described in Sec.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the several analytical and numerical modelings of bainite transformation, e.g. [45,46,47,48,49], an extensive analysis of the elastically governed autocatalytic evolution of a single variant is largely impending. Given the in uence of the autocatalysis in the formulation of the transformation kinetics, as described in Sec.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different transformations, especially those in steel, are described using this method [4]. However there are few phase-field models for the bainitic transformation [5,6], because it is one of the most complex transformations in steel. The formation of carbides has, up to our knowledge, not been considered until now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A coherency dislocation that can climb conservatively while accomplishing lattice transformation, adapted from [15]. The inset at the right is the representation of the coherency dislocation in a manner analogous to ordinary dislocations that have extra half-planes The first issue is particularly prevalent in phase field models of bainite where the parent, product and interface are all represented in terms of an order parameter; the interface is therefore diffuse [20][21][22][23]. Both, the definition of how the free energy density varies across the boundary and the assumption of particular systematic gradients within the diffuse interface are arbitrary.…”
Section: The Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…High resolution transmission electron microscopy has shown that the bainite-austenite interface is in reality sharp, less than 1 nm in thickness [24][25][26]. The treatment of the strain energy due to the shape deformation is either absent [20,21] or has been implemented incorrectly with shear occurring in all directions within the habit plane [22,23]. When the shape deformation is neglected, the plate shape is generated by an arbitrary anisotropy of interfacial energy; this procedure amounts to image generation rather than a physical representation.…”
Section: The Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%