2015
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.146795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase I–II, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial to Determine the Dosimetry and Safety of 99mTc-Sestamibi in Pediatric Subjects

Abstract: Myocardial perfusion imaging has long been used off label by practitioners attending for children with cardiac aliments. To provide clinicians with evidence-based dosage recommendation, a phase I-II, open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter trial was therefore designed using 99m Tc-sestamibi in pediatric subjects (registered under www.clinicaltrials. gov identifier no. NCT00162045). Methods: Safety and pharmacokinetic data were collected from 78 subjects using either a 1-d imaging protocol (3.7-7.4 MBq/kg, follo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that using the adult "residence times" in children for dosimetry is not a very bad approximation. This result is in line with dosimetry studies carried out directly in children which find satisfactory agreement with adult studies [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This means that using the adult "residence times" in children for dosimetry is not a very bad approximation. This result is in line with dosimetry studies carried out directly in children which find satisfactory agreement with adult studies [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results of the dosimetry study are reasonable and confirm findings in other products, i.e. Sestamibi [2] where the paediatric study was similar to that of adults. This approach is in line with the prospect of in silico clinical trials which we believe in the future will have a higher impact and may be in a position to replace real clinical studies, saving time and resources, while minimising risks for patients and volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation