2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10676-013-9324-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A philosophical and evolutionary approach to cyber-bullying: social networks and the disruption of sub-moralities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, face-to-face gossip makes use of verbal language, whilst cybergossip can take the form of written messages, images, and videos. Second, cybergossip messages are recorded and can be reproduced exactly as originally created, which may influence what is shared in the first place (Bertolotti and Magnani, 2013 ). Third, cybergossip has the potential to reach a wide audience, at any time, and instantaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, face-to-face gossip makes use of verbal language, whilst cybergossip can take the form of written messages, images, and videos. Second, cybergossip messages are recorded and can be reproduced exactly as originally created, which may influence what is shared in the first place (Bertolotti and Magnani, 2013 ). Third, cybergossip has the potential to reach a wide audience, at any time, and instantaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may explain why some people join in the bullying when they do not know the victim or the initiating bully. Bertolotti and Magnani (2013) describe this behaviour as gratuitously humiliating another person in public and compare it to "sociopathy." In this sense, it is similar to the "hate crimes" mentioned by G&F, and contempt rather than hate is more likely to justify such behaviour.…”
Section: Mihaela Coceamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering what we exposed so far, we can indeed see how this configuration equals setting a fight arena between human beings that became DACCs, as they obtained an ubiquitous access to their social cognition (and its enhancement by bits of artificial cognition) and, in return, paid the price of forsaking (at least as long as they act-as-DACCs) the real life subdivision that separates them but also protects them, and the groups they belong to, from each other [16,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If being cyborgs meant for instance carrying around powerful implanted weaponry, then the effects would be apparent to anyone: conversely, we are mostly unaware of the effects of our diffused social cyborgization apart from brief moments of wonder after some peculiar coincidences, or-we will see it in the next section-when the outcomes become violent. As already suggested by Bertolotti and Magnani [16], evolutionarily oriented cognitive studies cannot be spared from having their say about the matter inasmuch as pro-social technology is effective by reproducing and simulating our social-cognitive affordances (for instance, our inclination towards gossip), making the cyborgization of our selves utterly transparent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%