1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1980.00006.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Philosophical Dichotomy in Migration Research

Abstract: Development of a paradigm for migration is hindered partly because present modes of explanation are entangled within a web of assumptions emanating from two different research philosophies: an objective philosophy and a cognitive philosophy. The ways that each philosophy influences the selection of independent variables are discussed and a case is made for a philosophical synthesis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed research agenda on migration decision-making builds on a line of research initiated already more than 30 years ago (e.g. Fawcett 1985, see also White 1980), but greatly benefits from recent state-of-the-art findings in a variety of cognitive subfields across the social sciences. The process of mental time travel to possible, imagined futures, the complex dynamics of decisionmaking and the role of immediate and expected emotions have been explored in neuroscience, cognitive, social, developmental, and clinical psychology -all disciplines that have so far had little contact with core migration theorising.…”
Section: Conclusion: Imagining a Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed research agenda on migration decision-making builds on a line of research initiated already more than 30 years ago (e.g. Fawcett 1985, see also White 1980), but greatly benefits from recent state-of-the-art findings in a variety of cognitive subfields across the social sciences. The process of mental time travel to possible, imagined futures, the complex dynamics of decisionmaking and the role of immediate and expected emotions have been explored in neuroscience, cognitive, social, developmental, and clinical psychology -all disciplines that have so far had little contact with core migration theorising.…”
Section: Conclusion: Imagining a Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Macroeconomic Perspective Over two decades ago, White (1980) recognized a philosophical dichotomy in migration research between macro and micro approaches. From the macro perspective, migration was regarded solely as an empirical event; a largely preordained response to the stimulus of potentially higher income at some other residential location.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cadwallader (1992, p. 4) noted that the macro literature is very much grounded in the neoclassical economics literature with much attention being devoted to interregional wage di¤er-entials and human capital, whereas the micro literature is closely tied to the general framework of choice behavior as developed by psychologists. White (1980) set out the di¤erences as a ''philosophical dichotomy in migration research'' between objective and cognitive perspectives. Stage of the life-cycle is now considered to be one of the strongest predictors of individual-level migration decisions, yet a majority of macro studies do not contain much of any demographic disaggregation.…”
Section: Kenneth E Bouldingmentioning
confidence: 99%