2022
DOI: 10.1002/spp2.1433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phylogenetic approach to the study of the evolution of Hypermecaspididae (Olenida, Trilobita)

Abstract: Hypermecaspidinae (Trilobita; Olenidae) constitutes a monophyletic clade but its internal relationships are unknown and its phylogenetic position with respect to the rest of Olenida has recently been questioned. In order to propose a phylogenetic hypothesis, and to resolve the status of the group, a cladistic analysis of the hypermecaspidinids was performed. One hundred characters (28 quantitative and 72 qualitative) of holaspid morphology were coded for 30 taxa (18 Hypermecaspidinae). Two groups of analyses w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent explorations of the same matrix modified for analysis using a Bayesian approach frequently recovered trees where included Leptoplastides species formed a monophyletic clade (Wright and Hopkins, 2021). Nonetheless, different treatments also identified different distributions of trees that vary considerably in their topologies (Wright and Hopkins, 2021), so our understanding of genera and subfamilies within Olenidae remains in flux (see also Monti et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent explorations of the same matrix modified for analysis using a Bayesian approach frequently recovered trees where included Leptoplastides species formed a monophyletic clade (Wright and Hopkins, 2021). Nonetheless, different treatments also identified different distributions of trees that vary considerably in their topologies (Wright and Hopkins, 2021), so our understanding of genera and subfamilies within Olenidae remains in flux (see also Monti et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%