2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2004.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physically based model for dynamic failure in ductile metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the void coalescence process can be neglected. In the present work, we briefly address the constitutive equations for damage criterion since the details can be found in [2]. The material porosity f is determined from the total relative void volume V T and given by:…”
Section: Nucleation and Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore the void coalescence process can be neglected. In the present work, we briefly address the constitutive equations for damage criterion since the details can be found in [2]. The material porosity f is determined from the total relative void volume V T and given by:…”
Section: Nucleation and Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage evolution in ductile metals begins after a threshold strain [11,12] associated in our case to threshold porosityf t . The effective porosity f * is defined by the following relation [2]:…”
Section: Nucleation and Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, this type of modeling is suitable for description of so called strain rate and temper ature history effects (structure dependent) (Klepaczko, 1975;Klepaczko and Rezaig, 1996;Tanimura and Duffy, 1986). Moreover it has to be remarked that this type of constitutive description is required to understand dynamic failure mechanics which are often dislocation controlled (Campagne et al, 2005). The relationship between struc tural evolution and failure mechanisms has been recently explored in relevant publications by Rittel and co workers (Dolinski et al, 2010;Rittel et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of β typically ranges from 80 to 100% [Campagne et al 2005;Guo et al 2005] -in other words, between 80% or 100% of the plastic work is supposed to be converted into heat. However many experimental investigations have shown that the proportion of plastic work dissipated as heat is strongly dependent on temperature, strain and strain rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%