1957
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1957.tb05972.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Picture Sociometric Technique for Preschool Children and Its Relation to Teacher Judgments of Friendship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They then described each child by sorting the two Q-Sets into a predetermined rectangular distribution of nine categories (q-profile), on the basis of the similarity of each item to the children's behavior. Social preference was assessed by asking the 78 children from the sub-sample to nominate up to three classmates they liked most (preferences) and three that they liked least (refusals), a method derived from McCandless and Marshall (1957). By convention, the child's social competence score is the Pearson correlation, ranging between À1 and þ1, between his/her q-profile and a q-criterion, which is a composite description obtained by averaging the scores assigned by experts to each item.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They then described each child by sorting the two Q-Sets into a predetermined rectangular distribution of nine categories (q-profile), on the basis of the similarity of each item to the children's behavior. Social preference was assessed by asking the 78 children from the sub-sample to nominate up to three classmates they liked most (preferences) and three that they liked least (refusals), a method derived from McCandless and Marshall (1957). By convention, the child's social competence score is the Pearson correlation, ranging between À1 and þ1, between his/her q-profile and a q-criterion, which is a composite description obtained by averaging the scores assigned by experts to each item.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SC was assessed using seven indicators, representing three broad dimensions, namely (1) SE/M, using direct observations (rate scores for visual attention received plus positive and neutral initiated interactions); (2) behavioral and psychological attributes (BPA), using Q‐sort descriptions [California child Q‐sort (CCQ); Block & Block, ; and preschool Q‐sort (PQ), Bronson's adaptation of a Q‐sort originally used by Baumrind, ]; and (3) PA, using sociometric interviews (acceptance scores for nominations and paired comparison sociometric tasks, McCandless & Marshall, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PA dimension of SC was assessed using two sociometric interviews—peer nominations (McCandless & Marshall, ) and a paired comparison task (e.g., Vaughn & Waters, ). As with our other indicators, sociometric scores have the quality of being broadband indicators of SC (i.e., they do not assess a particular skill or social ability, reflecting instead an array of behaviors, interactions, and attributes in the context of peer relations that affect likeability).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociometric acceptance. Positive and negative sociometric scores were derived from a nominations sociometric task (McCandless & Marshall, 1957) administered individually by a trained research staff member. Children were presented with an array of photographs of their classmates and asked to identify a child they “especially liked.” After making three such choices, the children were asked to identify a classmate they “did not especially like.” They made three negative choices and then returned to the array to identify more “liked” children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%