2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pitzer Interaction Model for the NaNO3–NaNO2–NaOH–H2O System from 0 to 100 °C

Abstract: The solubility relations and water activities in NaNO3, NaNO2, and NaOH solutions are used in many applications, including the management of alkaline high-level nuclear waste. Only limited water activity data is available at temperatures above ambient for NaNO3 and NaNO2 aqueous solutions, so water activity was measured by isopiestic methods at 50 and 100 °C in this study. The results are consistent with the limited experimental data previously available. These data are used to parameterize the Pitzer electrol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pitzer parameters at 25 o C were taken from Kim and Frederick [18]. At 60 o C, parameters for NaOH have been reported by Reynolds et al [19] and the values for Na 2 MoO 4 were taken from Ref. [20].…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pitzer parameters at 25 o C were taken from Kim and Frederick [18]. At 60 o C, parameters for NaOH have been reported by Reynolds et al [19] and the values for Na 2 MoO 4 were taken from Ref. [20].…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F I G U R E 1 Water activity of sodium nitrite solution as a function of concentration at 50 C. Data from Reynolds et al 24 Zavitsas has successfully fit his model to water activity data for aqueous NaNO 2 solution up to saturation at 25 C. 5 The present author has fit Zavitsas' model up to 17.74 molal NaNO 2 concentration at 100 C, and found an excellent fit. 16 The model may not fit osmotic coefficients for some electrolyte solutions at concentrations less than 0.1 molal, but the model appears to be a good choice for modelers who are interested in solutions with higher concentrations.…”
Section: Why Zavitsas' Model?mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[18][19][20] The present author has used both models for radioactive waste at the Hanford Site in the United States. [21][22][23][24] These models and their cousins generally employ some form of the Debeye-Hṻckel equation in order to model electrolyte solution properties at low concentrations where the Debeye-Hṻckel equation applies. The Debeye-Hṻckel equation becomes increasingly less accurate as the concentration increases above 0.01 molal.…”
Section: Why Zavitsas' Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of the liquid phase activity coefficients is difficult at these high concentrations [35]. Sodium forms ion-pairs with many of the anions in the waste [36,37] further complicating the calculation of the activity coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Pitzer-based model to predict liquid-phase activity coefficients in Hanford waste is currently under development [37][38][39], though the current focus of the Hanford Pitzer model is on major components that affect the solubility of salts in the waste. The data is currently unavailable to build a model to calculate the activity coefficients of a trace species (Cs ? )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%