2002
DOI: 10.1080/080038302321117542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Place in the Memory of Nation. Minority Policy towards the Finnish Speakers in Sweden and Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Both in Norway and Sweden, the Samis and the Kven appeared in this period as clearly distinct peoples who lived in certain places in such concentrated communities that their existence was considered a problem which called for a special national policy (see Elenius 2002). The breakthrough for the policy of assimilation was not unique in the world in the nineteenth century.…”
Section: The Legacymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both in Norway and Sweden, the Samis and the Kven appeared in this period as clearly distinct peoples who lived in certain places in such concentrated communities that their existence was considered a problem which called for a special national policy (see Elenius 2002). The breakthrough for the policy of assimilation was not unique in the world in the nineteenth century.…”
Section: The Legacymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the late 19 th century until the middle of the 20 th century, the Finnish-speaking regional minority on the Swedish side of the Torne Valley was under pressure towards linguistic and cultural integration (e.g. Huss 1999;Elenius 2002). The condition of being a linguistic minority began to develop into an issue of social 'othering' in the late 19 th century when the Swedish national 'försvenskningspolitik' entailed the exercising of powerful political pressure on marginal groups in order to integrate them linguistically and culturally into the modern nation-state.…”
Section: The Socio-historical Background Of Meänkielimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Försvenskningnspolitik" with its aims of national security effected a practical categorical distinction with Russia, which during the era meant Finland, in all fields of human life, for the benefit of national security. Finnish-speaking people were perceived as an ethnically inferior population, an internal "other", compared to the Swedish-speaking majority (Huss, 1999;Elenius, 2002) -"a fact" that was ostensibly "proved" by the racial studies of Swedish anthropologists (Heith, 2012). Through institutional control, especially related to the school system, the marginalization of the Swedish Torne Valley became a concrete and mundane part of people's lives.…”
Section: Torne Valley and Meänkieli: Revitalizing An Othered Languagementioning
confidence: 99%