1998
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0057662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A plug-in architecture providing dynamic negotiation capabilities for mobile agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have, therefore, envisioned a model in which load balancing decisions in the system are made in the course of a multi-agent negotiation (see, also [33,30]). In this solution the overloaded agent sends a Call For Proposal (CFP ) message to other agents in the system, specifying objects it would like to "give away."…”
Section: Determining Which Objects To Move and Wherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have, therefore, envisioned a model in which load balancing decisions in the system are made in the course of a multi-agent negotiation (see, also [33,30]). In this solution the overloaded agent sends a Call For Proposal (CFP ) message to other agents in the system, specifying objects it would like to "give away."…”
Section: Determining Which Objects To Move and Wherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving in this direction, we have designed a Job Executor module, which provides an abstract interface to execute the user job. Note that in the system under development, we plan to utilize the modular agent design introduced originally by T. Tu and collaborators in the DynamiCS project (see, [26] for more details). There, it was shown, how agents can be composed on demand from specified components.…”
Section: Combining Agents and Globuspreliminary Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the primary objective of each participant is to maximise their own utility, normally at the cost of the opponent's utility; each participant has their own strategy, which is kept private [24]. If the opponent's strategy is known, it may be possible to take advantage of this fact and predict their behaviour, giving an unfair advantage.…”
Section: Background On Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jennings et al [13] give some details of a framework for automated negotiation, which focuses on rules of negotiation, and allowing many different types of negotiation to be carried out within the same framework. Tu et al [24] describe a way of dynamically adding negotiation abilities to an agent at run time using a pluggable architecture, and splitting the negotiation into components. We have split the negotiation in the same way.…”
Section: Background On Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%