2003
DOI: 10.1142/s0129626403001495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Negotiation Between Publishers and Consumers of Grid Notifications

Abstract: Notification services mediate between information publishers and consumers that wish to subscribe to periodic updates. In many cases, however, there is a mismatch between the dissemination of these updates and the delivery preferences of the consumer, often in terms of frequency of delivery, quality, etc. In this paper, we present an automated negotiation engine that identifies mutually acceptable terms; we study its performance, and discuss its application to a Grid notification service. We also demonstrate h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, although both Kasbah and NDF model the devaluation of goods with time using time-dependent NDFs, they were primarily designed for bilateral negotiations and did not take into consideration the influence of market factors. While there are some (but very few) works on building Grid-negotiation agents [10], [16], [17], most of these research efforts are preliminary, and both considering market dynamics and making tradeoff decisions are not among their research focuses (see Section V). The goal of this research is to show that market-driven agents (MDAs) (Section II) previously engineered for e-negotiation are appropriate tools for G-negotiation because they possess many desirable properties (see Section II-A) such as being able to negotiate optimally and make tradeoff decisions.…”
Section: ) G-commerce and Market-oriented Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, although both Kasbah and NDF model the devaluation of goods with time using time-dependent NDFs, they were primarily designed for bilateral negotiations and did not take into consideration the influence of market factors. While there are some (but very few) works on building Grid-negotiation agents [10], [16], [17], most of these research efforts are preliminary, and both considering market dynamics and making tradeoff decisions are not among their research focuses (see Section V). The goal of this research is to show that market-driven agents (MDAs) (Section II) previously engineered for e-negotiation are appropriate tools for G-negotiation because they possess many desirable properties (see Section II-A) such as being able to negotiate optimally and make tradeoff decisions.…”
Section: ) G-commerce and Market-oriented Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to economic models in [3], [7], and [8], there are also research initiatives (albeit, very few and very new) adopting negotiation models for Grid resource allocations [10], [16], [17] (see [41] for a survey). Preliminary work in this area aims to either integrate methods of negotiation [10] or adapt the negotiation mechanism by selecting from a range of methods [16].…”
Section: ) Negotiation Agents For Grid Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…29 They are responsible for asynchronous delivery of messages between publishers and consumers. Although the mechanism for asynchronous is well understood, some issues still remain.…”
Section: Emergence Of Adaptive Grid Notification Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%