1910
DOI: 10.2307/1412963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pluralistic Universe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…O que está em questão, segundo o próprio James, é "a suposição de que os assim-chamados estados de consciência podem separar-se e combinar-se livremente, além de manter sua própria identidade inalterada enquanto formam partes de campos simultâneos mais abrangentes de experiên-cia" (James, 1909(James, /1977.…”
Section: A Psicologia Após O Varieties: Defendendo a Tese Da Pervasivunclassified
“…O que está em questão, segundo o próprio James, é "a suposição de que os assim-chamados estados de consciência podem separar-se e combinar-se livremente, além de manter sua própria identidade inalterada enquanto formam partes de campos simultâneos mais abrangentes de experiên-cia" (James, 1909(James, /1977.…”
Section: A Psicologia Após O Varieties: Defendendo a Tese Da Pervasivunclassified
“…Enfin des chercheurs, souvent inspirés par Weick (1979Weick ( , 2001) et par les philosophies du processus (James, 1909(James, /1996Bergson, 1939Bergson, /2008Whitehead, 1929Whitehead, /1978, tentent de surmonter ces limites en analysant les liens étroits entre activité, processus organisant et production de significations (Hernes, 2010 ;Hernes & Maitlis, 2010 ;Shotter, 2006Shotter, & 2008Tsoukas, 2005 ;Tsoukas & Chia, 2002 ;Weick, 1979Weick, & 2001. C'est cette piste qu'on tentera ici de creuser en analysant de manière plus précise la relation entre activité et signification, à la lumière des concepts pragmatistes d'habitude et d'enquête.…”
Section: 2-tendances Récentesunclassified
“…11 A good ('valid' [Ljungberg, 2008;Angen, 2000], or 'credible' [Agar, 1986]; see also Merriam, 1995) interpretation is one which makes sense; that is, it is recognized by actors in the actual field. (We use sensemaking also to emphasise the procedural aspect of reality, truth, and knowledge; see also James, 1977James, [1909.) A notorious problem with this, however, is that it is difficult for a researcher to interpret the reaction of people to our descriptions and analyses of them, not only because they are of course very diverse, but also because people cannot be expected to recognise, or have critical distance, to the deep structures they themselves are part of (see Glynos and Howarth, 2008;Fay, 2006).…”
Section: Quality and Validation: On Feedback And Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%