2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A polarization model for a solid oxide fuel cell with a mixed ionic and electronic conductor as electrolyte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electronic conductivity of SDC is taken from a previous modeling work by our group, 23 which is also in line with relevant literature. 9,13,28 In the case of the anode, the scaffold is infiltrated with Cu, whose role is to enhance the electrical conductivity (at 700…”
Section: Model Equations and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electronic conductivity of SDC is taken from a previous modeling work by our group, 23 which is also in line with relevant literature. 9,13,28 In the case of the anode, the scaffold is infiltrated with Cu, whose role is to enhance the electrical conductivity (at 700…”
Section: Model Equations and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equivalent oxygen partial pressure is a way to represent the chemical potential of the oxide ions inside the MIEC electrolyte. 3,13,31 According to the usual phenomenological correlation, the electronic conductivity depends on the equivalent oxygen partial pressure, while the ionic conductivity does not. Considering the Ohm's law, the electronic leakage current in the electrolyte is expressed as:…”
Section: Model Equations and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the OCV is somewhat lower than 0.94 V, it is still higher than that of the SCDC fuel cell 0.85 V, and the power output of the device with 55% LSCF: 45% SCDC raises to 798 mW/cm 2 , see Figure 6. These facts, excluding the SCDC case, are in strong disagreement to the MIEC, which would have acted as a membrane instead of the electrolyte, and would cause significant losses in both voltage and power of the assembled device (Eguchi et al, 1992;Riess et al, 1996;Shen et al, 2014). This has been also proved by using the SCDC electrolyte due to its MIEC behavior in FC environment.…”
Section: Latest Progress On Scientific Studies Of Effcsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is known that the mixed ionic and electronic conductors (MIECs) developed for SOFCs cannot replace the electrolyte. Otherwise, the short-circuiting problem will cause serious device OCV and power output losses (Eguchi et al, 1992;Riess et al, 1996;Shen et al, 2014). The true situation in the EFFCs is very different from the MIEC behavior, because the EFFC does not show OCV loss in a proper composition range of doped ceria ionic materials and semiconductor compared to the pure ionic-doped ceria electrolyte device, which usually exhibits rather lower OCV of 0.85-0.9 V due to the ceria-based electrolyte reduced electronic conduction.…”
Section: Latest Progress On Scientific Studies Of Effcsmentioning
confidence: 99%