2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2003.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A positron emission tomography study of short- and long-term treatment effects on functional brain activation in adults who stutter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this view, the right hemisphere inferior frontal activation is a secondary consequence of the root problem, which is aberrant performance in the feedforward system. Poor feedforward performance leads to auditory errors that in turn activate the right-lateralized auditory feedback control system in an attempt to correct for the errors This hypothesis is consistent with the affects of fluency-inducing therapy on BOLD responses; successful treatment has been associated with a shift toward more normal, left-lateralized frontal activation (De Nil et al, 2003;Neumann et al, 2005).…”
Section: Implications For Speech Disorderssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…According to this view, the right hemisphere inferior frontal activation is a secondary consequence of the root problem, which is aberrant performance in the feedforward system. Poor feedforward performance leads to auditory errors that in turn activate the right-lateralized auditory feedback control system in an attempt to correct for the errors This hypothesis is consistent with the affects of fluency-inducing therapy on BOLD responses; successful treatment has been associated with a shift toward more normal, left-lateralized frontal activation (De Nil et al, 2003;Neumann et al, 2005).…”
Section: Implications For Speech Disorderssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Early electroencephalography (EEG) and dichotic listening studies suggest that stuttering speakers tend to have more activity in the right hemisphere of the brain during speech than do non-stuttering speakers (Boberg et al, 1983;Curry and Gregory, 1969;Moore, 1986;Moore and Haynes, 1980). More recent positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have further confirmed these results (e.g., De Nil et al, 2003;Fox et al, 1996Fox et al, , 2000Neumann et al, 2003;Preibisch et al, 2003;Wu et al, 1995). Although these results may lead one to believe that the right hemisphere is related to stuttering, a now-classic study by Braun et al (1997) revealed that activation in the right hemisphere was related to fluent speech among stuttering speakers, whereas activation in the left hemisphere was related to the production of stuttered speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…1) is the neural network involved in stuttering. Previous research showed that stuttering and non-stuttering speakers differ significantly in activation patterns in the BGTC, especially in the left frontal motor cortex, the temporal cortex, and the basal ganglia (e.g., Braun et al, 1997;Brown et al, 2005;De Nil et al, 2003;Fox et al, 1996;Giraud et al, 2008;Ingham et al, 2000). Within the frontal motor cortex, the supplementary motor area (SMA, including both the SMA proper and anterior supplementary motor area -preSMA) may play a special role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motor group specifies the task to be performed by each subsystem, but does not specify how performance of these tasks should proceed. This is because, depending on the configuration constancy of changes in the peripheral speech mechanisms (i.e., during connected, and therefore fluent, speech), the task may be performed via different paths, some of which may be more efficient than others (16,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%