DNAs extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes of 24 individuals, selected for their HLA-DR types, -DR2, -DR5, and -DRw6, were analyzed with four restriction enzymes, BamHI, EcoRV, HindIll, and Taq (al, a2) and 2(3 ((31, /32). In addition DZa and DO/3 genes have been characterized but not yet located (2, 3). The numerous antigens encoded by these loci were initially characterized by alloantisera against DR and DQ, homozygous typing cells (HTC), and by primed lymphocytes for D and DP determinants.The specificities recognized by T-cell proliferation in response to allogeneic stimulation by B cells were initially thought to be controlled by the HLA-D locus (4). When serological methods allowed the recognition of B-cell antigens coded by the HLA region, these antigens were correlated with their cellular counterpart. The similarity was sufficient to warrant the existence of DR locus (D related), and the same nomenclature was applied to the specificities defined by two different procedures (5). Subsequently, this position was no longer tenable as new D specificities had no DR equivalent or were included in broader DR reagents. With this approach, it was demonstrated that HTCs typed as DR4 could be resolved in five different clusters by the level oftheir proliferative response when tested against each other (6). Availability of proper alloantisera can lead to the recognition of some Dw types by serology. For example, subtypes of DR2, such as FJO or AZH defined by HTCs, can be serologically recognized (7). An alloantiserum has permitted the distinction of a variant of DRw6 (now DRw14) corresponding to Dw9 (8). However, there still remain Dw subtypes like Dw18 and Dwl9 (subtypes of Dw6), which evade serological recognition. Alleles at the DQ locus (formerly MB) are found in strong linkage disequilibrium with DR antigens. DQwl is usually associated with DR1, DR2, DRw6 (DRw13 and DRw14), and DRw10; DQw2 with DR3 and DR7; DQw3 with DR4, DR5, and DRw9 (20). The rare associations such as DRw13-DQw3 and DRw14-DQw3 raise different cellular response(s) when compared to DRw13-DQwl or DRw14-DQwl. This dissociation has led to the assumption that Dw specificities could correspond to the summation of epitopes present on DR, DQ, and other molecules (9).The obtention and use of class II cDNA probes represent an approach to unravel the complexity of this region through restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) studies (10, 11). The degree of polymorphism depends on the locus explored. Almost no polymorphism was observed for DRa; limited polymorphism was noted for DXa, DPa, and DP/3; in contrast DRf3, DQa, and DQP3 yielded extensive polymorphism (3,12). Generally, the majority of RFLPs correlate with supertypic specificities whereas fewer fragments are found with single DR specificities (12,13). Nevertheless, RFLPs specific for DR-associated subtypes have been reported (3,11,13,14). The aim of the present study was to investigate DRI and DQP RFLP in various subtypes of HLA-DR2, -DR5, and -DRw6. These subtypes selected f...