2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posteriori error analysis of an augmented fully-mixed formulation for the stationary Boussinesq model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and proceeding analogously to Lemma 3.9 (see also [6], Lemma 3.7), we obtain the remaining terms of 3.36. Further details are omitted.…”
Section: Lemma 311mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…and proceeding analogously to Lemma 3.9 (see also [6], Lemma 3.7), we obtain the remaining terms of 3.36. Further details are omitted.…”
Section: Lemma 311mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In particular, using the alternative definition of ℛ h (cf., 3.24) and proceeding similarly to Lemma 3.8, we find the first, second, and last term of the local estimator 3.36. On the other hand, considering the original definition 3.16 of ℛ h , noting that dθnormalDdsnormalL2ΓD, applying the integration by parts formula on Γ D given by (cf., [ , Lemma 3.5, equation 3.34]) ⟨⟩,normalcurl0.0emχ·boldnθnormalDΓD=⟨⟩,dθnormalDdsχΓDχnormalH1Ω and proceeding analogously to Lemma 3.9 (see also , Lemma 3.7), we obtain the remaining terms of 3.36. Further details are omitted.…”
Section: A Posteriori Error Analysis: the 2‐d Casementioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations