2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A potential glucuronate glycosyl donor with 2-O-acyl-6,3-lactone structure: efficient synthesis of glycosaminoglycan disaccharides

Abstract: Development of β-selective glucuronylation reaction using phenyl 2,4-di-O-acetyl-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranosidurono-6,3-lactone was described. Glycosylations of this glycosyl donor with hexosamine derivatives proceeded with excellent yield and β-stereoselectivity to afford glycosaminoglycan-type disaccharides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[16] In contrast to the common perception that the C-5 carboxylic acid ester is a strongly electron-withdrawing ("disarming") substituent, we found that in the β-manno series the C-5-carboxylate group (in combination with a 4-O-acetyl group) was in fact less disarming than the 4,6-O-benzylidene functionality. We currently have no adequate explanation for the reluctance of donor 1 to react with NIS/ TfOH, and note that this result is in contrast with a recent study reported by Furukawa et al, [18] who investigated glucuronic acid 3,6-lactone donors in combination with this activator; they reported that thiophenyl 2,4-di-O-acetylglucuronic acid 3,6-lactone donors are reactive glucuronylating species when activated with NIS/TfOH, and that its 2,4-di-O-benzyl counterpart was too reactive to be used as a donor. In the vast majority of competition experiments performed to date, thioglycoside donors have been combined with the N-iodosuccinimide (NIS)/triflic acid (TfOH) activator system.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…[16] In contrast to the common perception that the C-5 carboxylic acid ester is a strongly electron-withdrawing ("disarming") substituent, we found that in the β-manno series the C-5-carboxylate group (in combination with a 4-O-acetyl group) was in fact less disarming than the 4,6-O-benzylidene functionality. We currently have no adequate explanation for the reluctance of donor 1 to react with NIS/ TfOH, and note that this result is in contrast with a recent study reported by Furukawa et al, [18] who investigated glucuronic acid 3,6-lactone donors in combination with this activator; they reported that thiophenyl 2,4-di-O-acetylglucuronic acid 3,6-lactone donors are reactive glucuronylating species when activated with NIS/TfOH, and that its 2,4-di-O-benzyl counterpart was too reactive to be used as a donor. In the vast majority of competition experiments performed to date, thioglycoside donors have been combined with the N-iodosuccinimide (NIS)/triflic acid (TfOH) activator system.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Our previous studies utilized carboxybenzyl (CB) donors which require pre‐activation; therefore, we prepared thioglycoside derivatives 9 , 10 , and 11 to investigate whether glycosylations under standard (pre‐mix) conditions would prevent 1,4‐anhydrosugar formation. Glycosylation of 9 – 10 by pre‐activation with Ph 2 SO/Tf 2 O, followed by addition of glycosyl acceptor 7 (Table , entries 1,3, and 5), mainly led to 1,4‐anhydrosugar as expected . Galactoside 11 does not suffer from 1,4‐anhydrosugar formation as the C‐4 benzyl is positioned equatorially and afforded the α‐galactoside with excellent stereoselectivity ( α / β =20/1, Table , entry 5), in line with earlier reports .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our previous studies utilized carboxybenzyl (CB) donors which require pre‐activation; therefore, we prepared thioglycoside derivatives 9 , 10 , and 11 to investigate whether glycosylations under standard (pre‐mix) conditions would prevent 1,4‐anhydrosugar formation. Glycosylation of 9 – 10 by pre‐activation with Ph 2 SO/Tf 2 O, followed by addition of glycosyl acceptor 7 (Table , entries 1,3, and 5), mainly led to 1,4‐anhydrosugar as expected . Galactoside 11 does not suffer from 1,4‐anhydrosugar formation as the C‐4 benzyl is positioned equatorially and afforded the α‐galactoside with excellent stereoselectivity ( α / β =20/1, Table , entry 5), in line with earlier reports .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%