2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0262-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A powerful microbiome-based association test and a microbial taxa discovery framework for comprehensive association mapping

Abstract: BackgroundThe role of the microbiota in human health and disease has been increasingly studied, gathering momentum through the use of high-throughput technologies. Further identification of the roles of specific microbes is necessary to better understand the mechanisms involved in diseases related to microbiome perturbations. MethodsHere, we introduce a new microbiome-based group association testing method, optimal microbiome-based association test (OMiAT). OMiAT is a data-driven testing method which takes an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we propose CSKAT to test the association between microbiome compositions and an outcome of interest, where microbiome samples and outcome measurements within the same cluster are related to each other. Similar to other methods (Koh et al, 2017;Wu, Chen, Kim, & Pan, 2016), our CSKAT framework can also be used as a taxon association mapping tool by shifting the analysis unit to a lower taxonomic rank (e.g., genus or family). Through extensive numerical studies, we have seen that CSKAT can protect the correct Type I error and achieve higher power than these existing methods, especially when the sample size is small or moderate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we propose CSKAT to test the association between microbiome compositions and an outcome of interest, where microbiome samples and outcome measurements within the same cluster are related to each other. Similar to other methods (Koh et al, 2017;Wu, Chen, Kim, & Pan, 2016), our CSKAT framework can also be used as a taxon association mapping tool by shifting the analysis unit to a lower taxonomic rank (e.g., genus or family). Through extensive numerical studies, we have seen that CSKAT can protect the correct Type I error and achieve higher power than these existing methods, especially when the sample size is small or moderate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of related outcomes in microbiome studies include those from longitudinal and pedigree (family) studies (Borewicz et al, 2013;Goodrich et al, 2014;Lax et al, 2014;Morris et al, 2016;Turnbaugh et al, 2009). These methods usually assume unrelated samples and can lead to incorrect inference when there exists correlation among the outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such situations, positive‐definiteness correction may be needed to improve the behavior of the kernel‐based score test. The distance‐based kernel design has been widely used for microbiome association studies such as MiRKAT (J. Chen & Li, ; Zhao et al, ), MMiRKAT (Zhan, Tong, et al, ), and OMiAT (Koh, Blaser, & Li, ).…”
Section: Kernel Designs and Multiple Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance-based kernel design has been widely used for microbiome association studies such as MiRKAT (J. Chen & Li, 2013;Zhao et al, 2015), MMiRKAT (Zhan, Tong, et al, 2017), and OMiAT (Koh, Blaser, & Li, 2017).…”
Section: Distance-based Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%