1970
DOI: 10.1109/taes.1970.310063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Distribution-Free Detection Procedure for Multiple-Range-Bin Radars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would be particularly useful when N is large. Some results presented in [1] for a particular case of binary quantization suggest that this simplification can be introduced with little or no loss in detection performance.9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would be particularly useful when N is large. Some results presented in [1] for a particular case of binary quantization suggest that this simplification can be introduced with little or no loss in detection performance.9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These (discrete) densities were subsequently subjected to numerical convolutions in order to determine the distribution of the detector output TGS as given by (2). From the results with only noise present the thresholds required to yield specified values of false alarm probability could be determined.6 Due to the discreteness of the distributions, randomized decision rules were used to obtain the required value of Pf with equality.7 5For the nonparametric detector studied in [1] it is not difficult to show that the asymptotic relative efficiency is which is maximum for N = 6 corresponding to L = 1.9 dB. For N = 10 the asymptotic loss is 2.0 dB which is close to the loss found in II forM= 50.…”
Section: Detection Performance Of the Generalized Sign Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of nonparametric detectors in radar systems can be traced back to 1970s [1]. Nonparametric detectors can provide a Constant False-Alarm Rate (CFAR) under only rather general assumptions on the statistics of the underlying noise sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most nonparametric CFAR detectors are based on the use of signs (polarities) or ranks of received observations. Some examples of nonparametric radar detectors can be found in [1][2][3]. In the past, some nonparametric detectors have been applied to radar detection [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions suggested to tackle one problem degrades the performance In the other. In this paper, we show how both the problems can be handled reasonably well by using a modified version of distribution free CFAR processor [8]. Analytical results for the normal homogeneous interference situation and simulation results for the non-homogenous situations (clutter edges and multitarget situations) are presented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%