2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical global multi-stage method for fully automated closed-loop identification of industrial processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the final transfer function model developed with the help of the commercial identification tool (here, the Honeywell Profit Suite identification package ). In contrast to the Matlab SIT toolbox, the user is not requested to specify the nominator/denominator orders of the process transfer function.…”
Section: Selected Lab Exercises and Student Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the final transfer function model developed with the help of the commercial identification tool (here, the Honeywell Profit Suite identification package ). In contrast to the Matlab SIT toolbox, the user is not requested to specify the nominator/denominator orders of the process transfer function.…”
Section: Selected Lab Exercises and Student Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the user chooses the duration of the experiment. The design of the excitation signal is also crucial for the success of the identification method [5]. For building-use, we assume that the amplitude of the excitation signal should be limited to excite the system around a certain operation point.…”
Section: B System Excitation and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm uses the prediction error method to estimate the parameters of all model structures. Thus, we generate a bunch of models and look for the most effective one afterwards, as MacArthur proposes [5].…”
Section: B System Excitation and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The motivation for closedloop testing is to reduce implementation time and/or effort of the initial implementation as well as the ongoing need to re-identify the model of an industrial application in light of processes changes. These closed-loop testing methods, which require a preliminary or existing model, utilize uncorrelated dither signals either introduced as biases to the controller MVs or injected through the steady-state LP or QP, where additional logic or optimization of the test protocol may be performed (Kalafatis et al 2006;MacArthur and Zhan 2007;Zhu et al 2012). …”
Section: Two-stage Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%