2010 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1109/coase.2010.5584532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical implementation of distributed system control over an asynchronous Ethernet network using time stamped data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The testbed and the control design are discussed in more detail in [11] and [13]. Comparative results are also presented in [11] showing an order of magnitude improvement in the mean squared error between Φ and Ψ.…”
Section: B Reference Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The testbed and the control design are discussed in more detail in [11] and [13]. Comparative results are also presented in [11] showing an order of magnitude improvement in the mean squared error between Φ and Ψ.…”
Section: B Reference Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a specific case consider that system Ψ needs to build an estimate of system Φ. It can be shown that standard estimation algorithms fail when used in the presence of network jitter in the scale of 5ms [11]. We therefore adopt a two step process to introduce synchronous estimates for y Φ into Ψ .…”
Section: A State Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Local Area Networks, the IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP) standard has been studied in the context of sensor and control networks that support real-time applications [6]. Similar work in industrial control applications that communicate wirelessly indicates that the most accurate synchronization can be achieved by timestamping at the lowest level in the stack [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NTP accuracy ranges from 5 to 100 ms, which is not precise enough for PAR application [17]. To get more accurate synchronization in the local area network, the IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP) standard [18] can provide sub-microsecond synchronization [19]. To implement PTP, the front-end chassis needs to be capable of packing or unpacking Ethernet packets, and additional dedicated hardware and software are required, which increase both the complexity and cost of the front-end subsystem.…”
Section: Backend Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%