2017
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Tool for Surveillance of Surgical-Site Infections: A 5-Year Experience in Orthopedic Surgeries

Abstract: Continuous surveillance of surgical-site infection (SSI) is labor intensive. We developed a semiautomatic surveillance system partly assisted by surgeons. Most patients who developed postdischarge SSI were readmitted, which allowed us to limit postdischarge surveillance to this group. This procedure significantly reduced workload while maintaining high sensitivity and specificity for SSI diagnosis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:610-613.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 However, infections occur in the operating room (OR), even with best practices. 3,4 It is difficult to directly trace an individual SSI to an infection source or variable, so prior studies have measured microbial loads in the OR and/or have used readmissions data for postsurgical infection estimates. 5 One potential contributing factor to increased risk of SSI is microbial contamination in the OR, which previous studies have suggested could exceed the recommended 10 CFU/m 3 more than 50% of the time.…”
Section: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:391-397mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, infections occur in the operating room (OR), even with best practices. 3,4 It is difficult to directly trace an individual SSI to an infection source or variable, so prior studies have measured microbial loads in the OR and/or have used readmissions data for postsurgical infection estimates. 5 One potential contributing factor to increased risk of SSI is microbial contamination in the OR, which previous studies have suggested could exceed the recommended 10 CFU/m 3 more than 50% of the time.…”
Section: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:391-397mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em alguns estudos analisados, (4,13,(15)(16)(17)(18)20,(22)(23)(24)28) evidenciou-se que os métodos para vigilância das ISCs foram combinados entre si; ressalta-se que esta combinação é aceitável, no entanto, os critérios diagnósticos do Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) para definição da ISC devem ser adotados. (29) Recomenda-se que a vigilância da ISC seja realizada de forma retrospectiva ou prospectiva pela equipe do Serviço de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar (SCIH); seja no prontuário do paciente ou baseada nos resultados laboratoriais ou nas pistas contidas na prescrição do antimicrobiano; no entanto, o método de vigilância adotado deve estar de acordo com a realidade institucional, uma vez que pode apresentar limitações e impactar na interpretação das taxas e indicadores, qualidade assistencial e aumento de custos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…From a general point of view, the utilisation of diversified information sources (laboratory test results, pharmacy data, reoperation and readmission diagnosis codes) followed by computer data cross-referencing has been proposed for efficient detection of SSI ( Benenson et al, 2017;van Mourik et al, 2015). In particular, the exploitation of bacteriology results after surgery would be crucial but too time-consuming if used alone; the implementation of M2 with positive microbiology results is currently being tested in our establishment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%