2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24644-4_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pre-congruence Format for XY-simulation

Abstract: Abstract. XY -simulation is a generalization of bisimulation that is parameterized with two subsets of actions. XY -simulation is known in the literature under different names such as modal refinement, partial bisimulation, and alternating simulation. In this paper, we propose a precongruence rule format for XY -simulation. The format allows for checking compositionality of XY -simulation for an arbitrary language with structural operational semantics, by performing very simple checks on the syntactic shape of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 7.1, we present a congruence rule format for iocos based on the GSOS format proposed by Bloom, Istrail and Meyer [11] (Theorem 21). Some of the conditions of the rule format for iocos (Definition 16) have similarities with those of the rule format for XYsimulation given by Beohar and Mousavi in [8]. However, our rule format for iocos includes a rather involved 'global' condition that stems from the fact that a specification need only simulate input transitions from an implementation that are labelled with actions that the specification affords.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 7.1, we present a congruence rule format for iocos based on the GSOS format proposed by Bloom, Istrail and Meyer [11] (Theorem 21). Some of the conditions of the rule format for iocos (Definition 16) have similarities with those of the rule format for XYsimulation given by Beohar and Mousavi in [8]. However, our rule format for iocos includes a rather involved 'global' condition that stems from the fact that a specification need only simulate input transitions from an implementation that are labelled with actions that the specification affords.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%