2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Precedence Constrained Knapsack Problem with Uncertain Item Weights for Personalized Learning Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, according to some farmers' needs, precedence constraints are imposed, i.e., several chains of plants must be considered (Nancel-Penard, et al, 2022). However, the objective is to maximize the profit of land investment with the consideration of precedence constraints (Aslan, et al, 2023). This problem is a variant of the agricultural land investment problem (ALIP) presented by Saleh (Saleh, 2018) with the variant, where precedence constraints have been presented and imposed on pairs of items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, according to some farmers' needs, precedence constraints are imposed, i.e., several chains of plants must be considered (Nancel-Penard, et al, 2022). However, the objective is to maximize the profit of land investment with the consideration of precedence constraints (Aslan, et al, 2023). This problem is a variant of the agricultural land investment problem (ALIP) presented by Saleh (Saleh, 2018) with the variant, where precedence constraints have been presented and imposed on pairs of items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the mathematical representation of the PCALIP, we can observe that the solution domain of a 0-1 knapsack problem can be characterized by Equation (2) and Equation (4). By adding, Equation (3), the problem is changed and becomes another variant of the classical 0-1 knapsack problem, known as the precedence-constrained knapsack problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%