1997
DOI: 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.83.8_479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Precise Quantitative Analysis of Precipitates in Ti-bearing Interstitial-free Steel

Abstract: A more precise quantitative analysis of precipitates in Ti-bearing Interstitial-Free (IF) steel is made through the combination of both a Field-Emission Transmission Electron Microscope (FE-TEM) analysis and an analysis based upon chemical extraction and isolation. The non-stoichiometry of precipitates is precisely determined using either Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) or a new method by plasmon energy in Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) attached to FE-TEM. The non-stoichiometric compositio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our prediction that Cu can diffuse very fast is inductively deduced. Interestingly, there have been some reports in the field of irradiation-induced embrittlement in material for atomic reactors, [32][33][34][35][36] which mention that Cu diffusion is about two orders of magnitude faster than Fe self-diffusion and is interpreted through Self-Interstitial-Atom (SIA) mechanism, although these experiments are carried out by using Fe-1%Cu or Fe/Cu/Fe diffusion pairs heat-treated at over 1000 C. In our opinion, these phenomena have the same origin to our reports [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and each Cu-related or Cu-S-related phenomenon is viewed from a different angle.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our prediction that Cu can diffuse very fast is inductively deduced. Interestingly, there have been some reports in the field of irradiation-induced embrittlement in material for atomic reactors, [32][33][34][35][36] which mention that Cu diffusion is about two orders of magnitude faster than Fe self-diffusion and is interpreted through Self-Interstitial-Atom (SIA) mechanism, although these experiments are carried out by using Fe-1%Cu or Fe/Cu/Fe diffusion pairs heat-treated at over 1000 C. In our opinion, these phenomena have the same origin to our reports [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and each Cu-related or Cu-S-related phenomenon is viewed from a different angle.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Our standpoint [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and reviews of past studies have already been mentioned in details in the first report. 1) In addition, the sulfide precipitation in ferrite region in Ti-added steel has been already reviewed again in the second paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] However, as in non-Ti-added steel does, (3) a residual level of Cu in Ti-added steel has been also believed to be solute in steel and there are no papers to mention the phenomenon of Cu-S precipitation induced by a tramp element of Cu.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%