“…To develop successful area-wide IPM programs, it is critical to understand how coffee berry borer populations persist and disperse across the landscape ( Rodríguez et al 2013 ). Field studies conducted in Hawaii over the last 13 years have provided location-specific information on coffee berry borer development ( Hamilton et al 2019 ), flight activity ( Messing 2012 , Aristizábal et al 2017b , Johnson and Manoukis 2021 ), infestation ( Aristizábal et al 2017b , Johnson and Manoukis 2020 ), postharvest reservoirs ( Johnson et al 2019 ), Beauveria bassiana efficacy and spray strategies ( Greco et al 2018 , Hollingsworth et al 2020 , Woodill et al 2021 , Wraight et al 2021 , 2022 ), biological controls ( Brill et al 2021 , Castrillo et al 2020 , Follett et al 2016 , 2023 , Hollingsworth et al 2011 , Kawabata et al 2016 , Sim et al 2016 , Wraight et al 2018 , 2022 , Yousuf et al 2021 ), physical controls ( Johnson et al 2020 ), chemical controls ( Kawabata et al 2023 ), and cultural controls ( Aristizábal et al 2023b ). Still, there remain gaps in our knowledge of coffee berry borer population dynamics over space and time, limiting our understanding of the relative importance of site-specific differences among farming districts and elevations in this small but economically important and world-renowned coffee-growing region.…”