2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary evaluation of irradiation damage in model alloys by electric properties based techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CRPs [9] and MNPs [1], first predicted by Odette, have been identified and characterized by a combination of experimental techniques, including small angle neutron scattering (SANS) [2,[10][11][12][13], atom probe field ion microscopy (APFIM) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], combined electrical resistance Seebeck coefficient measurements (RSC) [19][20][21], and recently, positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) [22][23][24][25][26]. The characteristics of the CRPs and MNPs have been studied as a function of steel composition, heat treatment, irradiation temperature, neutron flux and fluence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRPs [9] and MNPs [1], first predicted by Odette, have been identified and characterized by a combination of experimental techniques, including small angle neutron scattering (SANS) [2,[10][11][12][13], atom probe field ion microscopy (APFIM) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], combined electrical resistance Seebeck coefficient measurements (RSC) [19][20][21], and recently, positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) [22][23][24][25][26]. The characteristics of the CRPs and MNPs have been studied as a function of steel composition, heat treatment, irradiation temperature, neutron flux and fluence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Seebeck coefficient of a material, also known as the thermoelectric power (TEP) [2], is dependent on its composition and microstructure [3]. Consequently, a range of studies have established TEP measurements are sensitive to thermal and irradiation embrittlement [4][5][6][7][8], hydrogen and nitrogen embrittlement [9][10][11], martensite content [12][13][14], and fatigue damage [15]. The use of the technique for material characterisation therefore appears promising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TEP measurements are particularly well suited to monitoring, as they are insensitive to changes in geometry which may occur over time and interfere with the measurement. 2 TEP measurements are sensitive to thermal and irradiation embrittlement, 3,[11][12][13][14] hydrogen and nitrogen embrittlement, [15][16][17] martensite content, [18][19][20] and fatigue damage. 21 In particular, sensitivity to the coupled spinodal decomposition of ferrite and sigma phase precipitation in stainless steels 13,19,22,23 makes it a promising technique for use in nuclear power station applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%