2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A primal–dual predictor–corrector interior point method for non-smooth contact dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only few attempts were made to solve contact problems using IPMs such as [30,31] for modelling granular contact dynamics. While, earlier attempts [32,33] did not use the most efficient forms of IPM methods, more recent implementations showed promising results in non-smooth contact dynamics [34] or isogeometric [35] contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few attempts were made to solve contact problems using IPMs such as [30,31] for modelling granular contact dynamics. While, earlier attempts [32,33] did not use the most efficient forms of IPM methods, more recent implementations showed promising results in non-smooth contact dynamics [34] or isogeometric [35] contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few IPA equally effective for both constrained and unconstrained optimization tasks. Recently, IPA is exploited in many fields e.g., active noise control problems [39], simulation of aircraft parts riveting [47], simulation of viscoplastic fluid flows [9], reliable treatment of economic load dispatch problem [38], for non-smooth contact dynamics [23] and non-smooth contact dynamics. In the proposed study, a hybrid computing tool PSO-IPA is exploited to tune the decision variables of ANN representing the model (1).…”
Section: Using the Log-sigmoid Activation Function 1 1 + Exp(−t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation of even five seconds of separation might involve large amounts of particles, thus leading to a computational bottleneck that, in the presented scenario, required up to one hour of computation. Therefore new classes of DVI solvers were used to improve the computational efficiency [38][39][40]. In addition, GPU parallel computing was adopted as discussed in [15].…”
Section: Vision System and Materials Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%