2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/6259682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Printed LPDA Antenna Fed by a Microstrip Line to Double Sided Parallel Strip Line from Backside

Abstract: A novel planar printed log-periodic dipole array (LPDA) antenna fed by tapered microstrip line (MSL) to double sided parallel strip line (DSPSL) is proposed in this paper. The proposed antenna adopts MSL feeding approach from backside. Using this feeding technique makes the printed LPDA antenna easier to be integrated into radio frequency (RF) circuits. In this paper, four layers are used to construct the antenna. The four layers of the printed LPDA antenna are printed on three thin dielectric substrates which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the above results, we compared performances of the PLPTDA antenna with its counterpart antennas in the literature; in terms of antenna size, bandwidth ratio and antenna gain (Table 1). Thus, the bandwidth of the proposed antenna is broader than those in [46, 1114, 16–18, 20, 21, 23, 24] and the measured gain of the PLPTDA antenna is higher than in [4, 6, 7, 1121, 23, 24]. Although the proposed antenna bandwidth is 1:9 same as the antenna in [15], they aimed to increase the antenna gain at WLAN (2.45 and 5.27 GHz) frequencies.…”
Section: Antenna Design and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above results, we compared performances of the PLPTDA antenna with its counterpart antennas in the literature; in terms of antenna size, bandwidth ratio and antenna gain (Table 1). Thus, the bandwidth of the proposed antenna is broader than those in [46, 1114, 16–18, 20, 21, 23, 24] and the measured gain of the PLPTDA antenna is higher than in [4, 6, 7, 1121, 23, 24]. Although the proposed antenna bandwidth is 1:9 same as the antenna in [15], they aimed to increase the antenna gain at WLAN (2.45 and 5.27 GHz) frequencies.…”
Section: Antenna Design and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%