2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A-priori direct numerical simulation assessment of sub-grid scale stress tensor closures for turbulent premixed combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to RANS modelling, the heat release effects also influence the sub-grid stress and sub-grid kinetic energy closures in the context of LES. The filtered momentum conservation equation in the context of LES takes the following form (Klein et al 2015): where denotes the kinematic viscosity, the sub-grid scale (SGS) stress tensor is given by SGS ij = u i u j − ũ iũj , and the isotropic part of the SGS stresses, i.e. the term involving…”
Section: Modelling Implications In the Context Of Large Eddy Simulatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to RANS modelling, the heat release effects also influence the sub-grid stress and sub-grid kinetic energy closures in the context of LES. The filtered momentum conservation equation in the context of LES takes the following form (Klein et al 2015): where denotes the kinematic viscosity, the sub-grid scale (SGS) stress tensor is given by SGS ij = u i u j − ũ iũj , and the isotropic part of the SGS stresses, i.e. the term involving…”
Section: Modelling Implications In the Context Of Large Eddy Simulatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Anderson and Domaradzki (2012) identified the sources of deficiency of the scale similarity models and suggested a new model for momentum transport in the context of LES of incompressible flows, using the assumption of splitting the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum into 3 different ranges denoting small R 3 , intermediate R 2 and large scales R 1 (Anderson and Domaradzki 2012), where R 3 represents the scales unresolved by the mesh, as discussed earlier in the context of sub-grid scalar flux closure. However, the original modelling methodology by Anderson and Domaradzki (2012) has been modified by Klein et al (2015) to make it both Galilei invariant and symmetric. The modified model expression according to Klein et al (2015) takes the following form: Equation 40 will henceforth be denoted as the IET model, i.e.…”
Section: Modelling Implications In the Context Of Large Eddy Simulatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Another DNS database (flames C and E) was created by Chakraborty et al 22,23 by simulating combustion in small-scale intense turbulence (the thin-reaction-zone regime 1 of premixed burning) and was also analyzed in a number of recent papers cited elsewhere. 24 Because the DNS data were already discussed in detail in the literature, we will restrict ourselves to a very brief summary of the simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One DNS database (flames H, M, and L) was created by Nishiki et al [ 29 , 30 ] by simulating weakly turbulent combustion in the flamelet regime and was analyzed in a number of recent papers [ 13 16 , 27 , 31 38 ]. Another DNS database (flames B, C, D, and E) was created by Chakraborty et al [ 39 , 40 ] by simulating combustion in small-scale intense turbulence (the thin-reaction-zone regime [ 1 ] of premixed burning) and was also analyzed in a number of recent papers cited elsewhere [ 15 , 16 , 27 , 41 ]. Because the DNS attributes were already discussed in detail in the literature, we will restrict ourselves to a very brief summary of the simulations.…”
Section: Dns Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%