2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the fair agreement between observed and simulated streamflow, and between the observed and simulated sediment yields, the model was assumed to be fit for further scenario analysis. Also, the fact that uncertainty related to the predicted relative changes of scenario outcomes can be assumed to be considerably smaller than the prediction uncertainty of absolute model outcomes was taken into consideration (Arabi et al 2007. Table 5 The erosion rate reduction for the key crops and the sediment reduction for the entire basin and the downstream reservoirs for each of the adoption levels studied (% in parentheses is change relative to baseline).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the fair agreement between observed and simulated streamflow, and between the observed and simulated sediment yields, the model was assumed to be fit for further scenario analysis. Also, the fact that uncertainty related to the predicted relative changes of scenario outcomes can be assumed to be considerably smaller than the prediction uncertainty of absolute model outcomes was taken into consideration (Arabi et al 2007. Table 5 The erosion rate reduction for the key crops and the sediment reduction for the entire basin and the downstream reservoirs for each of the adoption levels studied (% in parentheses is change relative to baseline).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the absence of recent river flow data, the long-term average discharge was used to assess the performance of the model assuming that, if the long-term average hydrology is simulated well, the model can be trusted to assess future changes in water availability. Moreover, it has been proven that relative model accuracy (difference between current situation and scenario) is higher than absolute model accuracy (difference between model output and observations) (Bormann, 2005;Arabi et al, 2007;. Figure 5 shows the results of the performance on stream flows.…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, for practical applicability, the selected number of 10 000 simulations is considered as reasonably sufficient for this study. The selected likelihood function is the Nash efficiency coefficient (NS) (Nash and Sutcliffe 1970), since it has been widely used as a likelihood measure within GLUE in the literature (Beven and Freer 2001, Arabi et al 2007, Shen et al 2012:…”
Section: Glue Generalized Likelihood Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%