2019
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic atlas of the human motion complex built from large‐scale functional localizer data

Abstract: Accurate motion perception is critical to dealing with the changing dynamics of our visual world. A cluster known as the human MT+ complex (hMT+) has been identified as a core region involved in motion perception. Several atlases defined based on cytoarchitecture, retinotopy, connectivity, and multimodal features include homologs of the hMT+. However, an hMT+ atlas defined directly based on this region's response for motion is still lacking. Here, we identified the hMT+ based on motion responses from functiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finding that our approach generates similar ROIs to other atlases (e.g., V1-V3 in the Wang et al (2014) atlas, Benson et al (2012) atlas) and hMT+ (Huang et al 2019) is important as it illustrates that these ROIs are robust to experimental design, stimuli type, and number of subjects that were used for generating atlases, all of which varied across studies. For example, we defined hMT+ by contrasting responses to expanding and contracting low contrast concentric rings to stationary ones in 19 subjects but Huang et al (2019) defined hMT+ by contrasting responses to dots moving in several directions vs. stationary dots in 509 subjects. Despite these differences,…”
Section: Consistent Definitions Of Visual Areas Across Different Atlasesmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finding that our approach generates similar ROIs to other atlases (e.g., V1-V3 in the Wang et al (2014) atlas, Benson et al (2012) atlas) and hMT+ (Huang et al 2019) is important as it illustrates that these ROIs are robust to experimental design, stimuli type, and number of subjects that were used for generating atlases, all of which varied across studies. For example, we defined hMT+ by contrasting responses to expanding and contracting low contrast concentric rings to stationary ones in 19 subjects but Huang et al (2019) defined hMT+ by contrasting responses to dots moving in several directions vs. stationary dots in 509 subjects. Despite these differences,…”
Section: Consistent Definitions Of Visual Areas Across Different Atlasesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To compare our atlas to the Benson atlas where there is no separation between ventral and dorsal quarterfields, we merged our dorsal and ventral V1-V3. Additionally, there is a published probabilistic atlas of CoS-places (Weiner et al 2018), and motion selective hMT+ (Huang et al 2019). We compared our surface visfAtlas to the existing surface maps by assessing their correspondence in the FreeSurfer fsaverage space.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Visfatlas To Existing Publicly Available Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In view of these observations, we encourage researchers to use individual functional and anatomical data for designing optode layouts when possible, but when anatomical data is available and functional data is not, probabilistic functional maps constitute a promising and economic alternative. FMRI-based probabilistic functional maps of the human ventral occipital cortex 93 , human motion complex 94 , face selective areas 95,96 , finger dominance in the primary somatosensory cortex 97 or across the whole cortex 36 are freely available or available on demand.…”
Section: Recommendations For Optode Placement and The Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%