“…In the sequel, each case study is labelled according to the following rule: Material_ L/D &soil profile_ V s so that, for example, the case S_2H_100 identifies a steel caisson of length equal to 2 diameters embedded in a homogeneous soil characterised by a shear wave velocity of 100 m/s, while the case C_4E_250 indicates a reinforced concrete caisson of length equal to 4 diameters embedded in a non‐homogeneous soil deposit characterised by a shear wave velocity of 250 m/s at depth of one pile diameter. Some parameters, deemed to have a minor effect on the variability of impedances and on the kinematic response,
32 are assumed to be constant; in detail, a density
t/m 3 and a Poisson's ratio
are considered for the soil. As for caissons, densities
equal to 2.5 and 7.85 t/m 3 , and Poisson's ratios
equal to 0.2 and 0.3 are considered for reinforced concrete and the steel skirts, respectively.…”