2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-007-0266-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic meta-predictor for the MHC class II binding peptides

Abstract: Several computational methods for the prediction of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II binding peptides embodying different strengths and weaknesses have been developed. To provide reliable prediction, it is important to design a system that enables the integration of outcomes from various predictors. The construction of a meta-predictor of this type based on a probabilistic approach is introduced in this paper. The design permits the easy incorporation of results obtained from any number of indiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there are significant peptide similarities in the "ALL" dataset, this could be due to overfitting. We plan to systematically examine how to best construct consensus predictions for MHC binding in the future, building on work done by us and others in the past [30,39,40]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there are significant peptide similarities in the "ALL" dataset, this could be due to overfitting. We plan to systematically examine how to best construct consensus predictions for MHC binding in the future, building on work done by us and others in the past [30,39,40]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we will explore the use of optimised voting algorithms to generate a viable meta-predictor, which unites the output of several prediction methods in an intelligent manner so that the combined output is more accurate and more reliable than any individual prediction program. Such approaches have been widely employed in other areas and even in immunoinformatics: Trost et al have addressed class I binding [31], while Karpenko et al have used this approach to predict class II MHCs binding [32]. We will seek to capitalise upon the as-yet-unrealised potential of such approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are Consensus (6), PM (24), AvgTanh (25) and MetaSVMp, which is based on stacked generalization (26). The first two approaches have been already examined to achieve good performance in the prediction of MHC binding peptides (6,24), while the rest two have been found very successful in other applications of machine learning (25,26). The basic idea of each ensemble approach can be summarized as follows:

Consensus: a set of random peptides is collected as a reference list, and then each predictor ranks peptides in this reference list.

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among four ensemble strategies in MetaMHC, Consensus is widely explored in the problem of predicting peptides binding to MHC, such as IEDB analysis tools (21). PM has been proposed by Karpenko et al (24) to improve the MHC class II binding prediction, but there are no web servers that implement this strategy. In addition, MetaMHC is the first web server to implement AvgTanh and MetaSVMp for improving the performance of predicting MHC binding peptides.…”
Section: Related Web Serversmentioning
confidence: 99%