2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2016.04.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic study of generalized solution concepts in satisfiability testing and constraint programming

Abstract: We study the probabilistic behaviour of solutions of random instances of the Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) and Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) that generalize the standard notion of a satisfying assignment. Our analysis focuses on a special type of generalized solutions, the (1,0)-super solutions. For random instances of k-SAT, we establish the exact threshold of the phase transition of the solution probability for k ≤ 3, and give upper and lower bounds on the threshold of the phase transition for the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the set of (1, 0)-super solutions is a subset of (1, 1)-super solutions, and the set of (1, 1)-super solutions is a subset of standard solutions. This explains why the upper bound on r of having (1, 0)-super solutions in Theorem 5 in [9] is smaller than that of having (1, 1)-super solutions in Theorem 1 and standard solutions obtained in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the set of (1, 0)-super solutions is a subset of (1, 1)-super solutions, and the set of (1, 1)-super solutions is a subset of standard solutions. This explains why the upper bound on r of having (1, 0)-super solutions in Theorem 5 in [9] is smaller than that of having (1, 1)-super solutions in Theorem 1 and standard solutions obtained in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Let σ be a fixed assignment, I be a random instance of model RB, and σ |= I be that σ satisfies I. We consider the following events which was similarly used in [9]:…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem to determine if a CNF formula is (1,0)-satisfiable is represented as (1,0)-SAT, and this corresponds to a k-CNF formula. It was shown in [22] that, for k ≤ 3, (1,0)-k-SAT is in P; otherwise it is in NP-complete. They also proved that, for Constrained Density (which is the clause-tovariable ratio) α < 1/3, a random 3-CNF formula is (1,0)-satisfiable with high probability, and not (1,0)-satisfiable with high probability for α > 1/3.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1,0)- k -SAT is the special version of (1,0)-SAT where each clause has exactly k distinct literals. Zhang P in [ 9 ] proved that (1,0)- k -SAT is in P for and in NP-complete for . Besides, it was proved that a random (1,0)-3-SAT are satisfiable with high probability for Constrained Density (the clause-to-variable ratio) , and not satisfiable with high probability for .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%