2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-012-9422-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A problem-solving conceptual framework and its implications in designing problem-posing tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we prepared the problem-posing task as a multiple-choice test. We preferred to use distracters in options, as did Singer and Voica (2012). Hence, we did not establish any evaluation criterion; we only assessed the correctness of problems posed by students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we prepared the problem-posing task as a multiple-choice test. We preferred to use distracters in options, as did Singer and Voica (2012). Hence, we did not establish any evaluation criterion; we only assessed the correctness of problems posed by students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barton (2003) studied how Pascal's Triangle can provide another opportunity to connect young children to deeper mathematical truth; the numeric form of Pascal's Triangle is filled with hidden relationships and connections to deeper mathematics concepts. Singer and Voica (2013) applied fractals in their study to develop a reference framework for designing problem-posing tasks. On the college level, Ding and Li (2009) studied the dimension of Sierpiński pedal triangle, which could be used by college students for practicing calculus knowledge.…”
Section: Research On Fractal Teaching Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, when problems are presented in multiple formats, students are better able to acquire deeper understandings (Cai et al, 2013;Singer and Voica, 2012). When students can revise the problem itself, or design an analogous one, their understanding of the subtleties of the problem increases (Priest, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%