2000
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
746
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 681 publications
(771 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
746
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of a vPFC neuron's response to these exemplars is shown in figure 1. Importantly, since the mean Wiener entropy (Tchernichovski et al 2000;i.e. a measure of the spectrotemporal structure of an auditory stimulus) of the food and non-food SSVs were not reliably different (t-test, pO0.05), differences in neural activity in response to SSVs from these two classes cannot be solely attributed to differences in their acoustics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a vPFC neuron's response to these exemplars is shown in figure 1. Importantly, since the mean Wiener entropy (Tchernichovski et al 2000;i.e. a measure of the spectrotemporal structure of an auditory stimulus) of the food and non-food SSVs were not reliably different (t-test, pO0.05), differences in neural activity in response to SSVs from these two classes cannot be solely attributed to differences in their acoustics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in an effort to score our songs more analytically, we used a f ully automated song comparison procedure described recently by Tchernichovski et al (2000) to assess intact-song stereotypy. This procedure compares two digitized sounds on the basis of four features: Wiener entropy, spectral continuity, pitch, and frequency modulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure was developed, initially, to compare the degree of similarity between the song of a tutor and that of its pupil. In this context, measures of overall similarity between songs using visual scoring by humans and that by the automated algorithm are comparable (Tchernichovski et al, 2000). However, the automated algorithm is better suited for measuring the degree of variability that might be present in successive repetitions of a same-song motif, which is why we used it to obtain a measure of stereotypy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations