1993
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis

Abstract: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) evaluates the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) but does not allow for a ranking of the efficient units themselves. A modified version of DEA based upon comparison of efficient DMUs relative to a reference technology spanned by all other units is developed. The procedure provides a framework for ranking efficient units and facilitates comparison with rankings based on parametric methods.DEA, linear programming, efficiency, sensitivity analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
1,441
0
80

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,001 publications
(1,526 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
1,441
0
80
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis of this approach is the estimation of input-as well as output-oriented order-m performance scores. In contrast to the order-m model presented above, Simar (2003) suggests to employ a 'leave-one-out' approach which is equivalent to the 'super-efficiency' concept of Andersen and Petersen (1993): During the estimation the unit of interest is excluded from the reference set. The calculations are conducted for different values of m. A unit is a potential outlier if its super-efficiency input order-m efficiency measures are greater than one plus a certain threshold α (in case of the output orientation, respectively, if the efficiency score is smaller than one minus α).…”
Section: A Methods To Calculate Innovation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of this approach is the estimation of input-as well as output-oriented order-m performance scores. In contrast to the order-m model presented above, Simar (2003) suggests to employ a 'leave-one-out' approach which is equivalent to the 'super-efficiency' concept of Andersen and Petersen (1993): During the estimation the unit of interest is excluded from the reference set. The calculations are conducted for different values of m. A unit is a potential outlier if its super-efficiency input order-m efficiency measures are greater than one plus a certain threshold α (in case of the output orientation, respectively, if the efficiency score is smaller than one minus α).…”
Section: A Methods To Calculate Innovation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If several DMUs are recognised as efficient, then the Anderson-Peterson (Andersen and Petersen, 1993) ranking approach is used to distinguish between DMUs.…”
Section: Linear Form Of Input-oriented Crs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for each individual DMU a new distance result is obtained, which leads to a new ranking, or even a rating of all the original efficient DMUs. Anderson and Petersen (1993) have developed the Super-Efficiency model based on a radial projection (including a CCR model) to arrive at a ranking of all efficient DMUs. The efficiency scores from a superefficiency model are thus obtained by eliminating the data on the DMU o to be evaluated from the solution set.…”
Section: A2 Super-efficiency Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%