Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs 2014
DOI: 10.3115/v1/w14-4109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Process for Predicting MOOC Attrition

Abstract: The goal of this shared task was to predict attrition in a MOOC through use of the data and logs generated by the course. Our approach to the task reinforces the idea that the process of gathering and structuring the data is more important (and more time consuming) than the predictive model itself. The result of the analysis was that a subset of 15 different data features did a sufficiently good job at predicting whether or not a student would exhibit any activity in the following week.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Li et al (2017), citing Zhou et al (2015), notes that "data preprocessing should be considered with more attention than learning algorithms". Sharkey and Sanders (2014) claims that feature extraction is "arguably the most important step in the process of developing a predictive model." Taylor et al (2014) state that "[w]e attribute success of our models to these variables (more than the models themselves)...any vague assumptions, quick and dirty data conditioning or preparation will create weak foundations for one's modeling and analyses," emphasizing their feature extraction methods over their modeling techniques despite fitting over 70,000 models in this experiment.…”
Section: Feature Extraction As Critical To Predictive Modeling In Moocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Li et al (2017), citing Zhou et al (2015), notes that "data preprocessing should be considered with more attention than learning algorithms". Sharkey and Sanders (2014) claims that feature extraction is "arguably the most important step in the process of developing a predictive model." Taylor et al (2014) state that "[w]e attribute success of our models to these variables (more than the models themselves)...any vague assumptions, quick and dirty data conditioning or preparation will create weak foundations for one's modeling and analyses," emphasizing their feature extraction methods over their modeling techniques despite fitting over 70,000 models in this experiment.…”
Section: Feature Extraction As Critical To Predictive Modeling In Moocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is whether a learner will still participate in the last week of the course [33][34][35]. The second is whether the current week is the last week a learner has activities [17,19,36]. Those two definitions are similar because they are related to the final state of a learner, and the dropout label cannot be determined until the end of the course.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction task was performed by the integrated predictor and evaluated by precision and recall as indicators. Similar researches are also done [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…7 Total time of watching videos The length of time spent on watching course videos on website. 8 Frequency of accomplishing assignments…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%