2017
DOI: 10.12783/dtssehs/meit2017/12893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding out Reasons for Low Completion in MOOC Environment: An Explicable Approach Using Hybrid Data Mining Methods

Abstract: Abstract. Because of the worldwide rapid development of MOOC, academic researches and industrial applications of MOOC have become a branch of the major concerns in modern education and information technology fields. This paper focuses on low completion phenomenon in MOOC environment and proposes an explicable approach to find out hidden reasons convincingly. Different from existing works, this approach utilizes data mining methods to make quantitative analysis. It employs learners clustering basing on their st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from other works, [19] apply an approach that used K-means to make quantitative analysis by employing students clustering aiming at discovering inactive students automatically in MOOC environment. Qiu et al [20] among other researchers focus on proposing dropout prediction models based on support vector machines.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Research On Mooc Dropoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from other works, [19] apply an approach that used K-means to make quantitative analysis by employing students clustering aiming at discovering inactive students automatically in MOOC environment. Qiu et al [20] among other researchers focus on proposing dropout prediction models based on support vector machines.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Research On Mooc Dropoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los resultados son superiores a los tradicionales de MOOCs. Si bien no hay consenso en el valor de compleción general de MOOCs, en general dicho valor es bajo [36]. Por ejemplo, es 5% para Button [13], según [10] la tasa de compleción de MOOCs es menor al 10% y para Onah et al [37] el valor promedio es 13%.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Moreno-Marcos et al [53] 2020 Coursera MOOC RF, GLM, SVM & DT Xing and Du [54] 2019 Canvas MOOC DL Liu and Li [55] 2017 XuetangX MOOC K-means Nagrecha et al [31] 2017 edX MOOC DT & LR Chen and Zang [56] 2017 Coursera MOOC RF Xing et al [43] 2016 Canvas MOOC GBN & DT Crossley et al [48] 2016 Coursera MOOC NLP Chaplot et al [46] 2015 [42] for successful predictions. Among ML algorithms, some works also focus on decision tree [43][44][45], sentiment-based artificial neural network [46], deep neural network [47], and natural language processing statistical models [48][49][50].…”
Section: Author Year Dataset Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%