2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A progressive synthetic strategy for class B synergimycins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibly a more viable strategy for circumventing resistance mediated by Vgb is altering type B streptogramins so as to reduce the affinity to Vgb without affecting binding to the ribosome. There is a rich literature on the synthesis of type B streptogramin variants using diverse strategies including synthetic (24), semisynthetic (25), chemoenzymatic (23,26), and solid-phase synthesis approaches (27). The analysis presented here on the similarities and differences between the binding of quinupristin to Vgb vs. the natural target can guide which alterations may reduce the drugs' susceptibility to bacterial resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly a more viable strategy for circumventing resistance mediated by Vgb is altering type B streptogramins so as to reduce the affinity to Vgb without affecting binding to the ribosome. There is a rich literature on the synthesis of type B streptogramin variants using diverse strategies including synthetic (24), semisynthetic (25), chemoenzymatic (23,26), and solid-phase synthesis approaches (27). The analysis presented here on the similarities and differences between the binding of quinupristin to Vgb vs. the natural target can guide which alterations may reduce the drugs' susceptibility to bacterial resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the cyclic peptides 2 and 3 were also obtained in good yields when DEPC/DEPBT cyclisation conditions were employed. A similar application of two or more coupling reagents at the same time (one-pot) has previously been reported to facilitate efficient ring-closing reactions by providing a choice of reagents for the specific substrate, which is in lieu of optimising each individual reaction for each individual coupling agent [10,37]. So far, no bioassays have been performed with the prepared cyclopeptides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amine was deprotected in Fragment 1 using TFA, and the acid was deprotected in Fragment 2 using lithium hydroxide. Fragments 1 and 2 were coupled using multiple coupling agents, yielding 14 examples of linear pentapeptides (50−74% yield) (Scheme ) 2 Cyclization of Sansalvamide Derivatives a a Conditions: (a) coupling agent [for linear peptides, typically HATU and TBTU (∼0.75 equiv ea); for cyclizations, HATU, DEPBT, PyAOP, PyBROP, and/or TBTU (∼0.5 equiv ea)], DIPEA (3 equiv), CH 3 CN; (b) HCl, anisole (2 equiv), CH 2 Cl 2 ; (c) LiOH (4 equiv), MeOH. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated in vacuo, and the acid was deprotected by neutralizing the reaction with lithium hydroxide and then adding an additional 4 equiv of lithium hydroxide in methanol to give pH = ∼11 . Following acid deprotection, the reaction was concentrated in vacuo and subjected to HATU, TBTU, PyAOP, PyBrop, and/or DEPBT coupling reagents (∼0.5 equiv each) and DIPEA (∼6 equiv until pH = 8) . The final macrocyclizations took approximately 4 days because of the low concentration (0.005−0.01 M) required to maximize the yield.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%