35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1997
DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proof of concept experiment for reducing skin friction by using a micro-blowing technique

Abstract: A proof of concept experiment for reducing skin friction has been conducted in the Advanced Nozzle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hwang [60] succeeded in the control by air blowing and showed that at М 1 ¼ 0.3 and C b ¼6 Â 10 À 3 , the minimal C f was reached, and there was a trend of its growth at further growth of C b . It is important that the minimum position depends on the permeable surface quality.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Modified Flowmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hwang [60] succeeded in the control by air blowing and showed that at М 1 ¼ 0.3 and C b ¼6 Â 10 À 3 , the minimal C f was reached, and there was a trend of its growth at further growth of C b . It is important that the minimum position depends on the permeable surface quality.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Modified Flowmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hwang [60] seems to be among those pioneers who realized the significance of some above mentioned geometrical parameters and started using permeable materials made by advanced methods for the blowing. He established that conventional porous materials utilized at early stages of researches, processed high roughness.…”
Section: Blowing Through the Wall With Uniformly Distributed Perforatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in skin friction of PN2 is as high as 60% (i.e., Cf/C, = 0.4) with the highest blowing rate of 0.205 kglmz/sec at a Mach number of 0.3 while the maximum reduction is 30% at a Mach number of 0.7. This difference was originally thought to be due to a Reynolds number effect [23]. After supersonic tests were conducted in which the skin friction reduction was even more than 80% the data of these subsonic tests were revisited and the real reason was found for why the reduction was less for Mach 0.7 than for Mach 0.3.…”
Section: Flat Plate Test In Subsonicjlow (1995-19% [23])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject of this paper is the innovative skin friction reduction method called the MBT [20,23]. The MBT has been developed through tests conducted since 1995 in the Advanced Nozzle and Engine Components Test Facility [21] at the NASA Glenn Research Center.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В досліджені [18] встановлено механізм взаємодії зву-кової хвилі та течії, внаслідок чого, на початку зони зриву виникають власні нестійкі коливання зсувного потоку. Під дією звукової течії відбувається посилення даних коливань, що призводить до приєднання потоку по всій довжині профілю, а при вимкненні -знову виникає зрив [19].…”
Section: аналіз літературних даних і постановка проблемиunclassified