1987
DOI: 10.1137/0518065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proof of the $G_2 $ Case of Macdonald’s Root System-Dyson Conjecture

Abstract: Dedicated to Joe Gillis on the occasion of his 75th birthday Key words, root systems, constant term identities, hypergeometric summation AMS(MOS) subject classifications. 31, 05A We will prove the following theorem. THEOREM Let m and n be integers and x, y and z commuting indeterminates; then the constant term of the Laurent polynomial F(x, y, z,: [(1-)(1-)(1_)]m[(1-xY)(1-iz)(1-x Y-z) ] " C(m,n)= (3m + 3n)!(3n)!(2m)!(2n)! (2m + 3n) !(m + 2n) !(m + n)!m!n!n! This is the G2 case of Macdonald's Root System-Dyson … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kadell [14] has previously proved these conjectures for all affine root systems of type 5(5^) and hence 5(2^), 5'(5 / ) v and SiDj). The Macdonald-Morris conjectures for R = G 2 have been proved by Habsieger [13] and Zeilberger [26]. See Garvan [8] for F 4 , Garvan and Gonnet [9] for 5(F 4 ) V , Zeilberger [27] for S(G 2 ) V and Opdam [20] for the q = 1 conjectures.…”
Section: A:=0mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kadell [14] has previously proved these conjectures for all affine root systems of type 5(5^) and hence 5(2^), 5'(5 / ) v and SiDj). The Macdonald-Morris conjectures for R = G 2 have been proved by Habsieger [13] and Zeilberger [26]. See Garvan [8] for F 4 , Garvan and Gonnet [9] for 5(F 4 ) V , Zeilberger [27] for S(G 2 ) V and Opdam [20] for the q = 1 conjectures.…”
Section: A:=0mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a not dissimilar manner, D. Zeilberger [175] showed that the n = 3 case of the Morris integral (1.17) leads to the Macdonald conjecture for the exceptional root system G 2 . This result later found application in a study linking random matrix theory to number theoretical L-functions [97], see also Section 4.5.…”
Section: Geometricallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most other cases of (2.8) were proved on a case by case basis, often using methods based on q-integrals of Selberg type [51,65,66,73,87,156,175,176,177], but the three exceptional root systems E 6 , E 7 and E 8 refused to surrender until I. Cherednik gave a uniform proof for all reduced root systems based on his theory of double affine Hecke algebras [29,30,31,111].…”
Section: Q-integrals and Constant Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The form of the sum L in (1.9) is suggested by identifying the polynomial F(W) in (1.9) with (W-x/y)(W -y/z)(W -z/x), where x, v, z are the variables in the constant term identity for G2 in [11,Theorem,p. 880].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%