Purpose: Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is currently not approved by Health Canada or the Food and Drug Administration for treating excessive blood loss in nonhemophiliac patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery, but is increasingly being used "off-label" for this indication. A Canadian Consensus Conference was convened to generate recommendations for rFVIIa use in on-pump cardiac surgery. Methods: The panel undertook a literature review of the use of rFVIIa in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Appropriateness, timing, and dosage considerations were addressed for three cardiac surgery indications: prophylactic, routine, and rescue uses. Recommendations were based on evidence from the literature and derived by consensus following recognized grading procedures. Results: The panel recommended against prophylactic or routine use of rFVIIa, as there is no evidence at this time that the benefits of rFVIIa outweigh its potential risks compared with standard hemostatic therapies. On the other hand, the panel made a weak recommendation (grade 2C) for the use of rFVIIa (one to two doses of 35-70 µg·kg -1 ) as rescue therapy for blood loss that is refractory to standard hemostatic therapies, despite the lack of randomized controlled trial data for this indication. Conclusions: In cardiac surgery, the risks and benefits of rFVIIa are unclear, but current evidence suggests that its benefits may outweigh its risks for rescue therapy in selected patients. Methodologically rigorous studies are needed to clarify its riskbenefit profile in cardiac surgery patients. 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4,; E-mail: keyvan.karkouti@uhn.on.ca Disclosure statement: Novo Nordisk (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), the makers of rFVIIa, funded this project through an unrestricted educational grant. Novo Nordisk was not involved in the selection of the members of the consensus panel, nor were they involved in the panel's review process, deliberations, conclusions, or manuscript preparation. The panel's chair selected the panel members, with the objective of achieving relevant multi-disciplinary expertise (i.e., anesthesiology, cardiac surgery, hematology, intensive care, and clinical epidemiology). The manuscript was primarily written by the panel chair (Keyvan Karkouti) and was approved by all of the panel members. All of the authors received an honorarium for attending the consensus conference.