2018
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Tumour Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitor-naïve and Non-naïve Patients With Crohn’s Disease: Real-Life Data From the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Abstract: Background and Aims:There is an unmet need to better understand the effectiveness of different biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases. We aimed at performing a multicentre, real-life comparison of the effectiveness of infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA] in Crohn's disease [CD]. Methods: Data of consecutive patients with CD treated with IFX and ADA from January 2013 to May 2017 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At both time points, response rates were not significantly different when comparing ADA with IFX (62% vs 65% after 1 year, 41% vs 49% after 2 years, respectively) [14]. These findings are in line with other studies and were recently confirmed in a propensity-score matched comparison in 632 adult CD patients, showing no significant difference in steroid-free remission rate when comparing IFX with ADA after one year in patients who had received other previous therapies (19.1% vs 27.7% respectively, p = 0.350) [15,16,17]. Furthermore, in addition to positive findings with IFX, ADA was recently proven to be effective in children and adolescents with moderately to severely active CD complicated by perianal fistulae in fistula closure [18,19].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At both time points, response rates were not significantly different when comparing ADA with IFX (62% vs 65% after 1 year, 41% vs 49% after 2 years, respectively) [14]. These findings are in line with other studies and were recently confirmed in a propensity-score matched comparison in 632 adult CD patients, showing no significant difference in steroid-free remission rate when comparing IFX with ADA after one year in patients who had received other previous therapies (19.1% vs 27.7% respectively, p = 0.350) [15,16,17]. Furthermore, in addition to positive findings with IFX, ADA was recently proven to be effective in children and adolescents with moderately to severely active CD complicated by perianal fistulae in fistula closure [18,19].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Certain clinical characteristics are known to predict response to anti-TNF therapy, mainly based on studies with adult patients. For both UC and CD factors associated with a good response are younger age (<40 years) at diagnosis, concomitant use of an immunomodulator and being naïve to anti-TNF therapy [15,43,44,45]. In addition, shorter disease duration [45], isolated colonic disease [46], elevated CRP [47,48], the absence of previous surgery in CD [15] and a hemoglobin >11.5 mg/dL in UC [49] are considered to have predictive value [50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several Western studies have shown no difference in clinical response and remission between these two TNF-α inhibitors. [24][25][26][27] Similar to our results, some studies from Western countries have shown no difference in the risk of surgery, hospitalization, and steroid utilization between IFX and ADA. [9][10][11]13,26,28 A retrospective cohort study using U.S. Medicare data showed no significant difference in the risks of abdominal surgery and hospitalization between IFX-and ADA-treated patients with CD (n=1,459 and n=871, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…5 Furthermore, the IL-23 receptor is a major susceptibility gene for CD and has led to the development of an anti-p40 immunotherapy that targets this pathway (Ustekinumab). 1,3 TNF-a blockade (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The IL-23 receptor is a major susceptibility gene for CD and has led to the development of an immunotherapy that targets this p40 protein subunit used by both the IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines (Ustekinumab). infliximab and adalimumab) has shown clinical benefit in managing the disease but 20-25% of patients with CD lost therapeutic responses at 12 weeks following commencement of anti-TNF-a therapy and between 30% and 60% lost responses by 12 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%