2015
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-7-w3-383-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proper Land Cover and Forest Type Classification Scheme for Mexico

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The imminent implementation of a REDD+ MRV system in Mexico in 2015, demanding operational annual land cover change reporting, requires highly accurate, annual and high resolution forest type maps; not only for monitoring but also to establish the historical baseline from the 1990s onwards. The employment of any supervised classifier demands exhaustive definition of land cover classes and the representation of all classes in the training stage. This paper reports the process of a data driven class sep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Land cover data were retrieved from the public repository managed by the National Forestry Commission of Mexico (CONAFOR) [38]. The original categories were reclassified based on the reclassification system proposed by Gebhardt et al [39]. The surface of Jalisco is covered by agriculture (29.8%), temperate forests (29.8%), tropical forests (25.5%), grasslands (8.9%), water (2.1%), human settlements (2.1%), scrublands (1.2%), bare soil (0.4%), other vegetation (0.2%), and wetlands (<0.1%), as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Study Site and Water Quality Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land cover data were retrieved from the public repository managed by the National Forestry Commission of Mexico (CONAFOR) [38]. The original categories were reclassified based on the reclassification system proposed by Gebhardt et al [39]. The surface of Jalisco is covered by agriculture (29.8%), temperate forests (29.8%), tropical forests (25.5%), grasslands (8.9%), water (2.1%), human settlements (2.1%), scrublands (1.2%), bare soil (0.4%), other vegetation (0.2%), and wetlands (<0.1%), as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Study Site and Water Quality Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INEGI LULC maps were used as training and validation data sets (242,170 samples), and the product has shown an overall accuracy of 71% [60]. Table 3 presents the LULC data sets with national coverage for the US.…”
Section: Lulc Data Sets For Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing this type of maps obtained during several years, it is possible to analyze tenden-cies of land cover patterns in rivers, since these ecosystems degrade as a result of agricultural, industrial and urban activities (Yang & Liu, 2007). In Mexico, there are several national reference maps with valuable information about LULC (Gebhardt et al, 2014;Gebhardt et al, 2015;INEGI, 2017;and Defourny et al, 2018), which are in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), specifically with SDG 6.6, which is about the protection and restoration of water-related ecosystems, including wetlands, rivers, aquifers and lakes (SDG, 2020). Their categorization is adjusted to the national level, and is commonly used to identify changes in different types of water-related ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%